Rights watchdogs laud SC bodycam rules
By J.Lo
"Alongside potential benefits of body-worn cameras, law enforcement must remain mindful of future challenges, especially on data management and privacy concerns, involving use of the technology as this has been an unexplored area in our law enforcement and criminal justice system," Commission on Human Rights (CHR) spokesperson Jacqueline de Guia said rights monitors welcomed Supreme Court's rules on use of Philippine National Police's newly-acquisitioned body-worn cameras.
To recall, official rules now require law enforcers to wear at least two body cameras in the implementation of search and arrest warrants. Police leadership hope that this will lessen cases of abuse and keep cops accountable.
In a statement, CHR said acquisition and new rules a "step in the right direction" but urged national police to be aware of the newfound ramifications and challenges they would bring.
The CHR would study the matter and adjust its own policies according to the Supreme Court guidelines to better investigate cases of human rights violations.
De Guia also said commission looks forward to "improvements in training and organization policies related to the use of body-worn cameras," as it calls for "partnerships and donations by PNP so that more police operations may benefit from this innovation and close gaps in its implementation."
"We have high hopes that this newly introduced technology to law enforcement and criminal justice system will result in better transparency and accountability, and thus may improve public's trust in law enforcement legitimacy,likewise, we push for the use of body-worn cameras as a preventive measure to reduce lethal force during police operations; to achieve improved resolution of complaints; and more effective evidence in judicial proceeding" she said.
Rules came amid mounting calls for safeguards on rules they claimed have been weaponized against dissenters and activists.
In a separate statement, rights watchdog Karapatan expressed wariness of what it said were "loopholes which may potentially be used by law enforcement officers in the course of implementation."
"We lament that such action came after numerous cases of killings, arbitrary arrests and detention and other rights violations in the government's war on drugs and counterinsurgency campaigns, we note that several proposals of lawyers and human rights groups have been considered in resolution, though we remain vigilant and mindful of the gaps and loopholes which may potentially be used by law enforcement officers in the course of implementation" Karapatan said.
The rights group pointed to unaddressed concerns by rights groups amid promulgation and implementation of bodycam rules, particularly accountability for those involved in past cases that did not have benefit of bodycam footage as evidence of police abuse in court.
It called on the High Court to "provide feedback on questions regarding trumped-up charges against activists in courts violating their right to due process and proposals for amendments of rules on the writs of amparo, habeas data, and habeas corpus to ensure protection of those facing threats from State actors."
"All cases wherein there are serious questions on use of search warrants against individuals including activists resulting in killings, arbitrary arrests and detention, and other rights violations should be subjected to immediate and urgent review and to pave way for releases of those who were subjected to wrongful actions," Karapatan urged.
Outside of high-profile cases, PNP leadership has dodged criticisms on instances of abuse and has stood by his agency's arrests and killings of progressives.
Police Gen. Guillermo Eleazar in earlier statements has gone as far as implying that targeting of activists and government critics in many of its operations is mere coincidence.
Jl212777@gmail.com
WordPress.com
No comments:
Post a Comment